One of my readers sent me this remark (probably while trying to work on the EBGP Sessions over the IPv6 LLA Interfaces lab):

I did attempt some of your labs, like IPv6 link-local-only BGP with FRR hosts, but FRR seemed not to play ball, or I was just doing it wrong.

As he was already using netlab, I could send him a cheat code:

Yesterday, I explained how you can run netlab examples in GitHub codespaces and mentioned that they work best with vendors who understand the value of frictionless downloads. But what if you’d like to use a device from one of the good guys who provide the container images but require a registration?

It turns out the solution is trivial:

A few days ago, someone asked me about the IPv4 next-hop details of running interface EBGP sessions. I pointed him to a blog post explaining them, adding, “And of course, you can test that in netlab.” A few minutes later, it hit me: instead of asking him to set up netlab locally, I could enable him to do that in a minute with GitHub codespaces.

Setting that up was easy: copy the .devcontainer directory from the BGP labs repository into the netlab examples repository and commit the change. After a short yak-shaving exercise (writing README files and rearranging a few folders), I successfully started the codespace and was ready for this blog post. There was just one gotcha…

Sharada Yeluri published an interesting overview of the evolution of network security, from packet filtering firewalls to GenAI and Quantum Computing (yeah, she works for a networking vendor ;). Definitely worth reading if you’re looking for an intro-level overview.

Some people insist on using Excel as the ultimate source of user-supplied data (including network automation source of truth).

If you agree with me that that’s not necessarily the best idea out there, you might enjoy this rant by Nikhil Suresh.

RFC 4264 defines BGP wedgies as “a class of BGP configurations for which there is more than one potential outcome, and where forwarding states other than the intended state are equally stable.” Even worse, “the stable state where BGP converges may be selected by BGP in a non-deterministic manner.”

Want to know more? You can explore a real-life BGP wedgie and fix it in the latest BGP lab exercise.

I plan to add several challenge labs using multihop EBGP sessions to the BGP labs project, including:

1. Running BGP between VMs and central BGP route servers
2. Using multihop EBGP session to send full Internet routing table to a customer without overloading the PE-router
3. Running EBGP EVPN session between loopbacks advertised with EBGP IPv4 session (🤢)

However, I would love to start with a simple use case to help engineers unfamiliar with BGP realize when they might have to use multihop EBGP sessions. Unfortunately, I can’t find one, and the scenarios where I used multihop EBGP in the past (EBGP load balancing and using a low-end router in the EBGP path, where I was effectively using the reverse application of #2 as a customer) are mostly irrelevant.

Would you have an easy-to-understand use case that is best solved with a multihop EBGP session? Please share it in the comments. Thanks a million!

I love open-source tools (and their GitHub repositories). Someone launches a cool idea, and you can dig through their source code to figure out how it works. It beats reading documentation or fixing AI hallucinations every day of the week ;)

Not too long ago, the containerlab team launched the ability to run containerlab within a free¹ container² running on GitHub, and that seemed like a perfect solution to run the BGP labs (Jeroen van Bemmel pointing me in the right direction was another significant step forward).

I don’t think I ever created two netlab releases in a week, but last week, I stumbled upon a motherlode of goodies, and it would be a shame not to make them available.

Someone tried to use netlab with vrnetlab containers for CSR 1000v and Nexus 9300v. We got it to work, but when I started integrating his changes into the development branch, I wanted to test them, so I installed vrnetlab to create my own container images. vrnetlab is an excellent tool, and building containers is a breeze (running them is a different story), so I added support for vrnetlab containers for every device supported by that tool and netlab for which I happened to have a disk image.

Here’s another rant to spice up your weekend: focus on fixing your company’s problems instead of chanting the AI mantra. Have fun ;)

In late 2023, I started playing with the idea of having automated validation in netlab. The early implementation was used in BGP labs, and a user liked it so much that he opened an issue saying:

I would suggest providing netlab validate for each lab.

Numerous rounds of yak-shaving later, I merged a humongous commit that adds automated validation to these lab exercises:

During the ITNOG8 netlab presentation, I jokingly said something along the lines “all that’s missing is RIPv2 and Babel.” That’s no longer true; someone asked me how hard it would be to add RIPv2 to netlab, and I said, “give me a few days 😎”

Other new features in netlab release 1.8.3 include support for BGP route servers (and route server clients), BGP Link Bandwidth community, and OSPF/BGP validation plugins for Arista EOS, Cumulus Linux and FRR. We also fixed the installation scripts to work with Ubuntu 24.04 and Debian Bookworm.

For more details, read the release notes.

Dan Massameno wrote a series of blog posts describing the challenges you might encounter when connecting Internet-of-Things¹ devices to a Cisco SD-Access network. It is an absolute must-read if you have to deal with IoT devices.

Vendor product managers love discussing mythical use cases to warrant complex functionality in their gear. Long-distance VM mobility was one of those (using it for disaster avoidance was Mission Impossible under any real-world assumptions), and high-volume network-based backups seems to be another. Here’s what someone had to say about that particular unicorn in a LinkedIn comment when discussing whether we need traffic engineering in a data center fabric.

When you’re dealing with a large cluster on a fabric, you will see things like inband backup. The most common one I’ve seen is VEEAM. Those inband backups can flood a single link, and no amount of link scheduling really solves that; depending on the source, they can saturate 100G. There are a couple of solutions; IPv6 or eBGP SID has been used to avoid these links or schedule avoidance for other traffic.

It is true that (A) in-band backups can be bandwidth intensive and that (B) well-written applications can saturate 100G server links. However:

Marc Brooker published an interesting blog post arguing that we need distributed systems for more than just scale.

Keep that in mind the next time someone tries to sell you the beauties of a centralized control plane – an idea that should be dead by now regardless of what ONF keeps preaching but will inevitably reappear in some form or other due to RFC 1925 Rule 11.