For years, netlab has had custom configuration templates that can be used to deploy custom configurations onto lab devices. The custom configuration templates can be Jinja2 templates, and you can create different templates (for the same functionality) for different platforms. However, using that functionality if you need an extra command or two makes approximately as much sense as using a Kubernetes cluster to deploy a BusyBox container.

netlab release 25.09 solves that problem with the files plugin and the inline config functionality.

In the EVPN Designs: Layer-3 Inter-AS Option A, I described the simplest multi-site design in which the WAN edge routers exchange IP routes in individual VRFs, resulting in two isolated layer-2 fabrics connected with a layer-3 link.

Today, let’s explore a design that will excite the True Believers in end-to-end layer-2 networks: two EVPN fabrics connected with an EBGP session to form a unified, larger EVPN fabric. We’ll use the same “physical” topology as the previous example; the only modification is that the WA-WB link is now part of the underlay IP network.

After I published the updated netlab topology graphs article, Samuel K. Lam quickly made a comment along the lines of now we know how the graph representing the following topology was made, adding a nice ASCII art that illustrated the point I was trying to make much better than my graphs:

Let’s see how close we can get to that ideal topology diagram with GraphViz and D2 graphs.

I’m too old to be fighting with windmills, but sometimes I have to get a rant off my chest. This one was triggered by the latest episode of the hilarious¹ “DHCPv6 on Android” soap opera

In a 720-degree turnaround, Android 11 supports DHCPv6, but only for prefix delegation purposes. Yes, you got it right, in a year or two, every phone might want to have a dedicated /64 prefix assigned to it on WiFi segments².

Want more details? Well, there’s a high-level overview published on the Android Developers blog and a corresponding message sent to the v6ops mailing list. Let’s see how much sense that makes.

Like OSPF and BGP, IS-IS contains a simple mechanism to authenticate routing traffic – IS-IS packets can include a cleartext password or an MD5- or SHA hash. Unlike OSPF, IS-IS can also authenticate:

• The hello packets exchanged between routers
• The contents of Link State PDUs flooded across an area or a domain.

Want to know more? Check out the Protect IS-IS Routing Data with MD5 Authentication lab exercise.

Click here to start the lab in your browser using GitHub Codespaces (or set up your own lab infrastructure). After starting the lab environment, change the directory to feature/3-md5 and execute netlab up.

I made most of the Ansible for Networking Engineers webinar public; you can watch those videos without an ipSpace.net account.

Want to spend more time watching free ipSpace.net videos? The complete list is here.

Someone approached me after my NOG.HR netlab presentation and said: “wouldn’t it be great if we could just start the lab from an example topology published on GitHub?”

It took me almost a year to get it done, but the functionality finally made it into the 25.09 release:

Is it possible to deploy Precision Time Protocol across a country-wide WAN network and reach nanosecond-level synchronization between cities? It’s definitely not trivial and only works over dedicated infrastructure; for more details, watch the PTP in WANs (video) presentation Oliver Ettlin had at SwiNOG 40.

Last week, I explained how to generate network topology graphs (using GraphViz or D2 graphing engines) from a netlab lab topology. Let’s see how we can make them look nicer (or at least more informative). We’ll work with a simple leaf-and-spine topology with four nodes¹:

defaults.device: frr
provider: clab

nodes: [ s1, s2, l1, l2 ]
links: [ s1-l1, s1-l2, s2-l1, s2-l2 ]

This is the graph generated by netlab create followed by dot graph.dot -T png -o graph.png:

When I was writing a blog post, I needed a link to the netlab lab topology documentation, so I searched for “netlab lab topology” (I know I’m lazy, but it felt quicker than navigating the sidebar menu).

The AI overview I got was way too verbose, but it nailed the Key Concepts and How It Works well enough that I could just use them in the netlab README.md file. Maybe this AI thing is becoming useful after all ;)

I wrote about the optimal BGP path selection with BGP additional paths in 2021, and I probably mentioned (in one of the 360 BGP-related blog posts) that you need it to implement IBGP load balancing in networks using BGP route reflectors. If you want to try that out, check out the IBGP Load Balancing with BGP Additional Paths lab exercise.

Click here to start the lab in your browser using GitHub Codespaces (or set up your own lab infrastructure). After starting the lab environment, change the directory to lb/4-ibgp-add-path and execute netlab up.

I always ask engineers reporting a netlab bug to provide a minimal lab topology that would reproduce the error, sometimes resulting in “interesting” side effects. For example, I was trying to debug a BGP-related Arista EOS issue using a netlab topology similar to this one:

defaults.device: eos
module: [ bgp ]
nodes:
  a: { bgp.as: 65000 }
  b: { bgp.as: 65001 }

Imagine my astonishment when the two switches failed to configure BGP. Here’s the error message I got when running the netlab’s deploy device configurations Ansible playbook:

During integration testing, I find unexpected quirks in network devices way too often. However, that’s infinitely better than experiencing them in production (even after thoroughly testing stuff) while discovering that your peers don’t care about routing security, RPKI, and similar useless stuff.

For example, what happens if you define a new Routing Control Function (RFC) on Arista EOS and apply it to BGP routing updates in the same configuration session? You’ll find out in the Sorry We Messed Up (video) presentation Stefan Funke had at SwiNOG 40 (note: the bug has been fixed in the meantime).

netlab release 25.09 introduced numerous graphing enhancements and a new graph type (IS-IS graphs), so I decided to write a series of blog posts explaining how you can generate graphs from netlab lab topologies.

I wrote an intro to netlab topology graphs years ago, and as expected, it was hopelessly outdated, so I started the project with a complete overhaul of that article.

On September 9th, the ansible release 12.0 appeared on PyPi. It requires ansible-core release 2.19, which includes breaking changes to Jinja2 templating. netlab Jinja2 templates rely on a few Ansible Jinja2 filters; netlab thus imports and uses those filters, and it looks like those imports pulled in the breaking changes that consequently broke the netlab containerlab configuration file template (details).

netlab did not check the Ansible core version (we never had a similar problem in the past), and the installation scripts did not pin the Ansible version (feel free to blame me for this one), which means that any new netlab installation created after September 9th crashed miserably on the simplest lab topologies.

This is the workaround we implemented in netlab release 25.09-post1 (released earlier today):