Scott Shenker on OpenFlow and SDN
Brent Salisbury sent me a link to a fantastic OpenFlow/SDN presentation Scott Shenker did @ Stanford University a few days ago. It’s a perfect introduction to the fundamental ideas behind SDN and therefore a must-see for everyone vaguely involved in networking.
Here are some of the highlights (from my highly biased perspective):
- They got it all wrong in the first iteration (@ 20:00) – it’s rare to see someone being so honest about past misconceptions;
- Network virtualization is the killer app, and SDN is just a means to an end (@ 25:00);
- MPLS was right (@ 32:00) – would love to see the reaction of a well-known SDN evangelist and MPLS basher ;)
- A network should have a complex edge and a simple core, with software switching at the edge (@ 38:00);
- Today’s networks are full of middleboxes which are already x86-based. The functionality of these middleboxes should be moved to x86-based devices at the network edge (@ 42:00);
- Network latency (actually intra-switch latency) doesn’t matter at the edge (@ 49:00).
There’s still a lot of handwaving and missing details, particularly as you move from tightly controlled environments (data centers) to large-scale WAN networks where individual components have to operate independently to be failure-resilient, but they’ll eventually get there.
This would be a perfect place to smugly list my blog posts (going all the way back to 2011) talking about exactly these same things ... but it’s sunny outside and the kids are waiting ;)
He actually said they got it mostly right, but a few things wrong. Isn't it? ;-)
Sadiq
I think Network Virtualization is more similar to Server Virtualization than people realize, with Server Virtualization people didn't buy new hardware at first. And Network Virtualization overlays also means we don't need to buy new hardware.
Overlays might not be the definitive form, but that is where people will start. It's just makes economic sense.
> Do you think that PfR is not SDN?