Category: automation

I got numerous responses to the “Why Does It Take So Long to Upgrade Network Devices,” the best ones coming from Béla Várkonyi and Frederic Cuiller.

Béla is sick-and-tired of the stuff vendors are shipping:

Every time we finish the Building Network Automation Solutions online course I ask the attendees to share their success stories with me. Stan Strijakov was quick to reply:

I have yet to complete the rest of the course and assignments, but the whole package was a tremendous help for me to get our Ansible running. We now deploy whole WAN sites within an hour.

Of course I wanted to know more and he sent me a detailed description of what they’re doing:

A long while ago Marcel Wiget sent me an interesting email along the lines “I think you should do a Software Gone Wild podcast with Phil Shafer, the granddaddy of NETCONF”

Not surprisingly, as we started discovering the history behind NETCONF we quickly figured out that all the API and automation hype being touted these days is nothing new – some engineers have been doing that stuff for almost 20 years.

Here’s another idea from the Building Network Automation Solutions online course: Ruben Tripiana decided to implement a latency measurement tool. His playbook takes a list of managed devices from Ansible inventory, generates a set of unique device pairs, measures latency between them, and produces a summary report (see also his description of the project).

One of my readers was so delighted that something finally happened after I wrote about a NX-OS bug that he sent me a pointer to another one that has been pending for a long while, and is now officially terminated as FAD (Functions-as-Designed… even documented in the Further Problem Description).

Here’s what he wrote (slightly reworded)…

Netfortius made an interesting comment to my Ansible playbook as a bash script blog post:

Ivan - aren't we now moving the "CLI"[-like] approach, upstream (the one we are just trying to depart, via the more structured and robust approach of RESTAPI).

As I explained several times, I don’t know where the we must get rid of CLI ideas are coming from; the CLI is root of all evil mantra is just hype generated by startups selling alternative approaches (the best part: one of them was actually demonstrating their product using CLI).

Whitespace handling is one of the most confusing aspects of Jinja2, thoroughly frustrating many attendees of my Ansible and Network Automation online courses.

I decided to fix that, ran a few well-controlled experiments, and documented the findings and common caveats in Whitespace Handling in Jinja2 video.

After explaining the basics of PowerShell, Mitja Robas described how to do implement the “Hello, World!” of network automation (collecting printouts from network devices) in PowerShell.

To watch all videos from this free webinar, register here.

You’ll need at least free ipSpace.net subscription to watch the video.

Got this feedback on my Ansible for Networking Engineers webinar:

This webinar is very comprehensive compared to any other Ansible webinars available out there. Ivan does great job of mapping and using real life example which is directly related to daily tasks.

The Ansible online course is even better: it includes support, additional hands-on exercises, sample playbooks, case studies, and lab instructions.

However, Ansible is just a tool that shouldn’t be missing from your toolbox. If you need a bigger picture, consider the Building Network Automation Solutions online course (and register ASAP to save $700 with the Enthusiast ticket).

One of my readers sent me a question about his favorite annoyance:

During my long practice, I’ve never seen an Enterprise successfully managing the network device software upgrade/patching cycles. It seems like nothing changed in the last 20 years - despite technical progress, in still takes years (not months) to refresh software in your network.

There are two aspects to this:

I know that everyone learns in a slightly different way. Let me share the approach that usually works well for me when a tough topic I’m trying to master includes a practical (hands-on) component: running controlled experiments.

Sounds arcane and purely academic? How about a simple example?

A week ago I talked about this same concept in the Building Network Automation Solutions online course. The video is already online and you get immediate access to it (and the rest of the course) when you register for the next live session.

We’re slowly wrapping up the autumn 2017 Building Network Automation Solutions online course, so it’s time to schedule the next one. It will start on February 13th and you can already register (and save $700 over regular price as long as there are Enthusiast tickets left).

Do note that you get access to all course content (including the recordings of autumn 2017 sessions) the moment you register for the course. You can also start building your lab and working on hands-on exercises way before the course starts.

After explaining the challenges of data center fabric deployments, Dinesh Dutt focused on a very important topic I covered in Week#3 of the Building Network Automation Solutions online course: how do you separate data (data model describing data center fabric) from code (Ansible playbooks and device configurations)

It’s always great to see students enrolled in Building Network Automation Solutions online course using ideas from my sample playbooks to implement a wonderful solution that solves a real-life problem.

James McCutcheon did exactly that: he took my LLDP-to-Graph playbook and used it to graph VLANs stretching across multiple switches (and provided a good description of his solution).

One of my readers coming from system development area asked a fundamental question about the role of automation in enterprise IT (somewhat paraphrased):

[In system development] we automate typical tasks from the pre-defined task repository, so I would like to understand broader context as the automation (I guess) is just a part of the change we want to do in the system. Someone needs to decide what to do, someone needs to accept the change and finally the automation is used.

Of course he’s absolutely right.