The early October 2021 Facebook outage generated a predictable phenomenon – couch epidemiologists became experts in little-known Bridging the Gap Protocol (BGP), including its Introvert and Extrovert variants. Unfortunately, I also witnessed several unexpected trips to Mount Stupid by people who should have known better.

To set the record straight: everyone’s been there, and the more vocal you tend to be on social media (including mailing lists), the more probable it is that you’ll take a wrong turn and end there. What matters is how gracefully you descend and what you’ve learned on the way back.

When I started creating the How Networks Really Work series, I wondered whether our subscribers (mostly seasoned networking engineers) would find it useful. Turns out at least some of them do; this is what a long-time subscriber sent me:

How Networks Really Work is great, it’s like looking from a plane and seeing how all the roads are connected to each other. I know networking just enough to design and manage a corporate network, but there are many things I have learned, used and forgotten along the way.

Two weeks ago I replied to a battle-scar reaction to 7-layer OSI model, this time I’ll address a much more nuanced view from Russ White. Please read his article first (as always, it’s well worth reading) and when you come back we’ll focus on this claim:

The OSI Model does not accurately describe networks.

Like with any tool in your toolbox, you can view the 7-layer OSI model in a number of ways. In the case of OSI model, it can be used:

I should have known better, but I got pulled into another stretched VLANs for disaster recovery tweetfest. Surprisingly, most of the tweets were along the lines of you really shouldn’t be doing that and that would never work well, but then I guess I was only exposed to a small curated bubble of common sense… until this gem appeared in my timeline:

Interestingly, that’s exactly how IP works:

One of my readers sent me this interesting question:

It begs the question in how far graduated students with a degree in computer science or applied IT infrastructure courses (on university or college level or equivalent) are actually aware of networking fundamentals. I work for a vendor independent networking firm and a lot of my new colleagues are college graduates. Positively, they are very well versed in automation, scripting and other programming skills, but I never asked them what actually happens when a packet traverses a network. I wonder what the result would be…

I can tell you what the result would be in my days: blank stares and confusion. I “enjoyed” a half-year course in computer networking that focused exclusively on history of networking and academic view of layering, and whatever I know about networking I learned after finishing my studies.

I was speaking with a participant of an SDN event in Zurich after the presentations, and he made an interesting comment: whenever he experienced serious troubleshooting problems in his career, it was due to lack of understanding of networking fundamentals.

Let me give you a few examples: Do you know how ARP works? What is proxy ARP? How does TCP offload work and why is it useful? What is an Ethernet collision and when would you see one? Why do we need MLD in IPv6 neighbor discovery?

All the videos in the Data Center Fabric Architectures webinar are now available without a valid ipSpace.net account.

The webinar hasn’t been updated in years, so the vendor-specific information is mostly obsolete. However, I’m sure you’ll still find the requirements, architectures, designs, and technology overviews sections relevant.

To watch more free ipSpace.net videos, browse them here, or click the Access Free Content button in any webinar roadmap.

After Kazuya Takahashi released his wonderful network-xray tool and added it as an external tool to the open-source BGP configuration labs, I wrote a short document explaining how to start external tools in your BGP labs without changing the lab topology, and how it works in GitHub Codespaces (hint: wonderfully).

I also modified all lab instructions to include a pointer to the optional tool-setup step.

Happy labbing ;)

TL&DR: Programmers writing Cisco Nexus OS code should have known better. They didn’t (care?).

One can understand that an operating system written in the late 1980s generates crappy suboptimal error messages, even though it was known even in those days how to do things right.

Is it too much to hope that the programmers writing newer operating systems (like Cisco Nexus OS) would be better? Obviously, it is 🤦‍♂️

When Donnie Savage announced the open beta of OpenEIGRP, I quickly asked him whether it would be possible to get an easy-to-use container with OpenEIGRP integrated with other FRR daemons (and its CLI).

Donnie delivered ;) – you can download a ready-to-use container and try its EIGRP features. Let’s see how you can make that process even simpler with netlab: