Unequal load-sharing with static routes is almost impossible as there is no configuration command to assign non-default traffic share count to a static route. For example, if you configure two default routes, one pointing to a low-speed interface and another one pointing to a high-speed interface, there is no mechanism to force majority of the traffic onto the high-speed link (IOS ignores interface bandwidth when calculating load sharing ratios).

You can, howerer, use a workaround: if you configure multiple routes for the same prefix pointing to the same interface, that interface will attract proportionally more outbound traffic.

The IP Service Level Agreement (SLA) measurement feature of Cisco IOS is extremely SNMP-oriented. For example, there is no easy way to generate a logging message when an SLA operation fails (or exceeds the threshold). However, Embedded Event Manager reading SNMP variables can help you get there.

Have you ever wanted to be notified when your router loses a specific route (for example, the default route toward the Internet)? In IOS release 12.4T you can do it with a combination of Enhanced Object Tracking and Embedded Event Manager 2.2.

One of the most commonly asked load-sharing-related questions is “can I load-share traffic across unequal-cost links?”. In general, the answer is no. In order to load-share the traffic, you need more than one path to the destination and the only way to get multiple routes toward a destination in the IP routing table is to make them equal-cost (the only notable exception being EIGRP that supports unequal-cost load-sharing with the variance parameter).

There are, however, two cases where you can force unequal traffic split across equal-cost paths toward a destination: when using inter-AS BGP with the link bandwidth parameter, and when using unequal-bandwidth traffic-engineering tunnels.

Someone managed to scramble the VTY numbers displayed with the show users and show line commands in IOS release 12.4. The VTY numbers in the show printouts no longer correspond to the numbers in the router configuration.

Recenty, a lot of people were looking for information on the sl_def_acl access list. Here's the whole story: if you've configured IOS login enhancements on your router, the router generates an access list named sl_def_acl (unless you specify your own with the login quiet-mode access-class command) the first time it has to enter the quiet mode. This access-list is then applied to the VTY lines whenever the router enters the quiet mode and removed from the after the quiet period is over. The access list itself is left in the running configuration.

Marko asked a very interesting question: What is the default class policy in a firewall policy-map (policy-map type inspect)? Or, using his original wording, "is it mandatory to use class class-default/drop" at the end of every policy map?

As it turns out, the default action for any class (unless you specify otherwise) is drop. By default, packets not matched by any traffic class are therefore dropped (unless you specify a different action in the class-default), similar to well-known ip access-list behavior.

In the security advisory detailing the Crafted IP Option Vulnerability (a nasty bug that allows an intruder to reset your router with a ping packet), the authors forgot to mention a great tool available in IOS release 12.3(4)T (and integrated in 12.4): the ability to filter packets with IP options in an access-list.

I've tried to be a "good citizen" in one of my Embedded Eveng Manager (EEM) applications and used the action 1.1 cli command "copy running-config startup-config" instead of the (supposedly obsolete) action 1.1 cli command "write memory" command. However, as the copy command generates console prompts (unless you turn them off with the file prompt quiet command), it immediately hung my EEM applet.

Moral of the story: use write memory :)

IOS has (yet another) nice "underdocumented" feature - if you don't have an enable password/secret configured on your router, you can access IOS HTTP(S) server (assuming it's enabled with the ip http server command) without any authentication whatsoever. Of course you'd never do that in a production environment, but it's nice to know you can always configure the router from a web browser if needed (see also the discussion on default passwords with Cisco SDM).

I get a lot of hits via Google from people searching for a default username on Cisco router. It's ages-old news, but there is no default username. Period. If you have to get access to a router and cannot remember the password(s), the only thing left is the password recovery mechanism ... although even that can be disabled with the no service password-recovery configuration command.

There are, however, a few things you can do if you want to relax the access to your router in a lab environment (never do it in a production network):

• If you configure no enable password, you can switch to enable mode without supplying a password
• If you want to telnet to a router without supplying a password, configure no login on the vty lines.
• If you want to be in privilege mode immediately after accessing the router, configure privilege level on the console or vty lines.

In my discussion of per-packet versus per-destination load sharing, I've relied on the "accepted wisdom" that out-of-order TCP packets reduce session performance (as a side note, out-of-order UDP packets are a true performance killer; just try running NFS with out-of-order packets).

Today I've discovered another huge show-stopper: stateful firewalls (read: almost everything in use today) might just drop out-of-order packets, resulting in TCP timeouts and retransmissions (and repeated timeouts will totally wreck the session throughput). Here's how Cisco devices handle this problem:

• PIX allows three out-of-order packets per TCP session (cannot be changed, but should be enough)


• You can configure out-of-order packet handling on ASA with the queue-lenght parameter of a tcp-map
.

• Cisco IOS firewall (formerly known as CBAC) drops out-of-order packets until release 12.4(11)T where you can use the ip inspect tcp reassembly configuration command (and it looks like the zone-based firewall configuration is not yet supported).

You could limit terminal access to a router with an access-class in line configuration command for a very long time (since, at least, IOS release 10.0). However, the access-class command only accepted standard access-lists, allowing you to restrict access solely based on source IP addresses. In the meantime, this feature quietly got upgraded to support extended access lists. In the IOS release 12.4, the command even accepts (undocumented !) named access lists.

These new features give you the ability to implement interesting policies, for example:

• Telnet access is only allowed from the network management station.
• SSH access is allowed from anywhere within internal network

You can also use the extended access list logging functionality, making it possible to log every connection attempt to the router.

If you want to disable the Cisco IOS more ... prompt (for example, when listing router's configuration with the show running command), set the terminal screen length to zero with the terminal length 0 exec-mode command. To change the terminal lenght permanently, use the length lines line configuration command, for example:

line console
 length 0
line vty 0 4
 length 0

Note: this article is part of You've asked for it series.

Cisco has in IOS release 12.3(4)T (integrated into 12.4) finally introduced features (long available in Unix and Windows) that slow down dictionary attacks on a router. On top of logging of login failures, you can also slow down the login process by delaying the router response after a login failure with the login delay seconds command.

On top of that, the you can configure the router to enter quiet mode after several login failures have been detected in specified timeframe with the login block-for seconds attempts tries within seconds configuration command.