The Static routing with Catalyst 3750 post has generated a lot of good, creative ideas. Some of the proposed solutions were better than the others and some were simply not implementable (but nonetheless, had great creative potential :). Here is my list of the favorites:

A routing protocol: as a few of you have rightly pointed out, this is the best choice.

Aggressive Unidirectional Link Detection (UDLD): this is my second favorite, as it's a reliable link-level mechanism that will detect a break in the fiber cable … exactly the right tool for the job.

In a previous post, I've described how the track interface ip routing command reports incorrect interface state if you use IP Event Dampening feature. To track the actual IP routing readiness of an interface, you could use the following workaround:

• Create a static IP route pointing to the interface you want to test. Make sure this route is not redistributed into any routing protocols.
• Track the reachability of the static route

Here's an interesting scenario:

We have two sites, each using a Catalyst 3750 switch, and routing between them using static routes. There's a primary fiber link between them and we're using twisted-pair-to-fiber converters due to port limitations on Cat3750. These converters do not report fiber link down status correctly (the carrier is still present on twisted pair even if fiber is down), so the primary Ethernet interfaces do not go down if the fiber link breaks and the primary static route is not removed, requiring manual action to switch over to the backup link.

The setup is summarized in this diagram:

If you'd like to implement persistent DHCP bindings on Cisco IOS, but cannot store them on an external server, you could always use the on-board NVRAM. Simply configure ip dhcp database nvram:dhcp.txt. Later on, you can examine the contents of the dhcp.txt file with more nvram:dhcp.txt command.

This post was written in 2007, when a lot of low-end Cisco routers still shipped with flash formatted in the “old” Cisco format and the flash was not really usable to store ever-changing files. For more details on storing DHCP bindings in onboard flash, read the Flash-based DHCP Database blog post.

Although it's not exactly trivial, you can use standard Tcl packages with Tcl
shell on Cisco IOS by following this procedure:

• Install a Tcl interpreter on your workstation (use ActiveState's ActiveTcl in Windows environment).
• Collect all the source files needed for your set of packages into one directory on your workstation.
• Execute Tcl pkg_mkIndex command in that directory.

$ tclsh
% pkg_mkIndex . *.tcl
% ^Z
$

• Edit the pkgIndex.tcl file created with the pkg_mkIndex command and set the $dir variable to the IOS directory before the first package command (for example, set dir "flash:tcl/").
• Alternatively, add the Tcl command set dir [file dirname [info script]] in front of the first package command. This command sets the $dir variable to the path of the pkgIndex.tcl file.
• Transfer all the source files into a directory on the router's flash (or any other local storage device).
• Configure the execution of the pkgIndex.tcl file at tclsh startup with the scripting tcl init configuration command (for example, scripting tcl init flash:tcl/pkgIndex.tcl).

When you have completed these steps, the pkgIndex.tcl file will be executed every time the Tcl shell is started in Cisco IOS, defining all the packages you've prepared. Now you can use the package require name Tcl command to load the packages you need in your Tcl script.

I've recently replaced my old home router (well, actually a combination of two low-end models, one could handle ISDN and the other one 3DES) with a 1812. After I've struggled past the “interesting” interface names (it has 8 switched ports, named FastEthernet2 to FastEthernet9) and brushed up my BVI/VLAN skills, configuring it was a breeze … only the DHCP server was causing me problems; every time my laptop would wake from the standby mode, it would take almost half a minute before it got the LAN IP address. The obvious suspect (as I've installed the 12.4(15)T on it) was the software, the next one DHCP ping timers.

After replacing the software (didn't help) and tweaking DHCP timers (no change), it finally dawned on me: the ethernet ports are switched, so the spanning tree was playing tricks with me. Disabling spanning tree with the spanning-tree portfast interface configuration command solved the problem.

The on-line configuration help for the ip dhcp conflict logging configuration command (logging: Record address conflicts in a log file) is one of the more misleading texts I've found in Cisco IOS (and the CCO documentation is not much better). Here's how it actually works ...

The track number interface name ip routing command is supposed to track an interface readiness to forward IP packets. In reality, it only tracks the interface line protocol status plus the IPCP status in case of PPP interfaces (as well as the actual presence of an IP address on the interface). If you configure IP Event Dampening (with the dampening) command, the interface might be suppressed (unavailable for IP routing), but the track object will report it as available (tested on IOS release 12.4(6)T). This could result in suboptimal HSRP/GLBP decisions if you use track objects to influence HSRP/GLBP priority or actual loss of data if you use such a track object to control policy-based routing.

Most MPLS books (mine included) and courses tell you that you have to manually enable MPLS on each interface where you want to run it with the mpls ip interface configuration command. However, this task was significantly simplified in IOS release 12.3(14)T with the introduction of MPLS LDP autoconfiguration. If you use OSPF as the routing protocol in your network, you can use the mpls autoconfig ldp [area number] router configuration command to enable LDP on all interfaces running OSPF (optionally limited to an OSPF area).

As the careful readers of my MPLS books know, it’s dangerous to run LDP with your customers; the moment you run LDP with them (Carrier’s carrier model is an exception), they can insert any labeled packet into your network, bypassing inbound access lists and sending traffic where it’s not supposed to go (even into another VPN). It’s vital that you consider security implications before deploying MPLS LDP autoconfiguration.

Using this feature on P routers is absolutely safe, as they have no customer links. You have to be more careful on the PE routers, more so if you run routing protocols with your customers. The safest configuration method would be to configure LDP autoconfiguration inside a single OSPF area, but even then, a configuration error (placing a PE-CE interface in a wrong area) could open your network to MPLS-based attacks.

I have been aware of the typeahead Tcl command for months, but somehow I never got it to work.

It works perfectly in IOS release 12.4(15)T; this is what you have to do to clear interface counters:

Are you as upset as I am with the constant display of the legend in front of the routes displayed with the show ip route command? Two output filters can help you.

One of my readers recently asked an interesting question: “How do you install a static route when an IP address is not reachable?”

Without going into the design reasons that prompted the question, you can actually track when IP SLA measurement fails with an obscure configuration syntax of the track objects that tracks when another track object fails.

Contrary to what the regular reload does, the warm reload does not change the configuration register value (obviously that's done by ROMMON, which is not involved in the warm reload process). If you just did a password recovery and changed the configuration register back to a normal value, you'd thus be unpleasantly surprised when the NVRAM would be ignored (yet again) after a warm reload (I stumbled across this as I was trying a new IOS release with the reload warm file URL command).

If you have configured your router as a DHCP client, you can use the default router option received in a DHCP reply as the next-hop for a static route. For example:

ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 dhcp

You could use this functionality in scenarios where your core network uses DHCP (for example, in metropolitan networks using layer-2 Ethernet transport from an ISP), but your router needs a different default route.

You can also use this feature to change the administrative distance of the DHCP-based default route (or you could use the ip dhcp-client default-router distance value configuration command that one of the readers described in a comment to a previous DHCP-related post).

Any other good ideas where this might come handy? Post them as comments ...

In his comment, Michal has asked about the ability to execute IOS commands with prompts from Tcl shell. I haven't found a generic solution yet, but you can reload a router from a Tcl script. First you have to define an EEM applet that reloads the router and can be triggered from command-line interface:

event manager applet forceReload
 event none
 action 1.0 reload

Now you can use the exec "event manager run forceReload" Tcl command in your Tcl script to run the applet (and reload the router).