For whatever reason, a lot of people have the impression that the wildcard bits in the OSPF network statement have to be the inverse of the interface subnet mask. For example, if you have configured ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.240 on an interface, they would enter network 192.168.1.2 0.0.0.15 in the OSPF configuration ... and obviously use one network statement per interface.
In reality, the network statements work like simple IP access-list: whenever an interface IP address matches the network statement, the interface is put into the selected area. The IOS is also pretty helpful recently: the network statements are automatically sorted from most-specific to least-specific and (like with the access lists) the first match stops the search.
In my network implementations, I use the network statements in three different ways:
- If I have to assign a specific interface into an area, I would always use network x.y.z.w 0.0.0.0 area n;
- If the area address ranges are nicely assigned (which also helps immensely when you have to start summarizing), you can use a single network statement to cover the whole area. If, for example, area 3 has address range 10.1.16.0/20, use network 10.1.16.0 0.0.15.255 area 3;
- If the router has all interfaces in a single area, I would almost always use network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area area-id (unless there is an extremely good reason that some interfaces should not be seen by the OSPF process).